SSP vs. evidence
We compare what the SSP claims against what the evidence actually supports, then flag supported, partial, contradicted, and no-evidence items.
Hardseal reviews your compliance evidence package for SSP-to-evidence contradictions, AI-generated artifacts, boilerplate risk, and pre-assessor readiness gaps. Standard value is $5,500. You get a clear diagnostic path without a certification claim.
First contact is scope only. Do not send sensitive evidence through email or checkout. Hardseal confirms the handoff path after fit and scope are clear.
We compare what the SSP claims against what the evidence actually supports, then flag supported, partial, contradicted, and no-evidence items.
We screen for prompt leakage, boilerplate clustering, suspicious timestamp patterns, generic narratives, and unsupported references.
You receive field-level findings and a prioritized remediation path so your team can move toward stronger evidence before formal review.
Hardseal publishes the AI-era evidence contamination engine so buyers can inspect the method, run the tests, and verify the no-phone-home design before sending a packet.
The core detector is public, MIT-licensed, and built with Python standard library only.
Eight detectors, enriched evidence payloads, schema checks, commitment verification, and 107 passing tests.
The engine supports pre-assessment evidence review. It does not certify compliance, replace a C3PAO, or guarantee an assessment result.
The review is built to be simple for busy teams: start the review, confirm scope, send the evidence package through an agreed handoff path, receive findings, and decide what to fix next. The full client path is laid out on the experience page.
Use email for the first 5 design partner slots. Use Stripe or invoice workflow if the free slots are gone or procurement requires a standard paid engagement. Do not send sensitive evidence through checkout.
Hardseal confirms the matter type, evidence set, target controls, timeline, contact owner, and whether the review is for a contractor, MSP, RPO, or consultant-supported team.
You receive the agreed handoff instructions. The goal is a clean packet: SSP or draft SSP, policies, screenshots, exports, tickets, POA&M notes, and relevant control evidence.
Hardseal checks where the narrative is supported, partial, contradicted, or not yet evidenced. The review also looks for AI/boilerplate signals and unsupported language.
You get a clear findings packet with contradiction notes, risk notes, remediation priorities, and plain-English rationale your team can act on.
If included or requested, Hardseal walks through the findings so your team can decide what to fix, what to clarify, and what needs a follow-up readiness sprint.
Yes. Payment starts the engagement, then Hardseal coordinates scope and evidence handoff. If your organization needs procurement review, request invoice first.
No. A draft can be reviewed if it is the current working narrative. The goal is to compare what the packet claims against what the artifacts support.
No. It is evidence integrity support before formal review. Your assessor or authorized assessment organization makes formal assessment decisions.
You still get value. The findings show where evidence is missing, contradictory, generic, unsupported, or worth fixing before a formal review.