File SHA-256
85f340d77505d334cf390b2b4eb090f5827f48f32c10ff84517c261fa4799ec8
Public synthetic native CMMC receipt
Receipt #5: Objective-sliced packet QA.
A native CMMC evidence-gap receipt for IA.L2-3.5.3. It shows one synthetic finding can be recomputed offline and rejected if the claim, evidence, finding, reviewer question, or limits change.
Receipt chain root
e64cea918ba9a26ee395d4d8e1e5caede4261a984ea61beab7569d0c1a5a1af0
Control slice
IA.L2-3.5.3 / 3.5.3[a]-[d]
Verification command
python3 downloads/verify_cmmc_packet_qa.py verify cmmc-packet-qa-receipt5.json
What this receipt covers
- One synthetic IA.L2-3.5.3 packet QA finding.
- Objective slices 3.5.3[a], 3.5.3[b], 3.5.3[c], and 3.5.3[d].
- Packet claim, evidence observed, finding, reviewer question, next proof needed, and explicit limits.
- Fixed section order and SHA-256 chain root over the native CMMC receipt.
What a PASS means
The JSON sections still match the recorded Hardseal receipt structure, section hashes, and receipt chain root. Anyone can recompute it locally with the native stdlib-only Python verifier.
What it does not mean
This is not customer evidence, not a live assessment artifact, not a formal review result, and not a claim that any organization meets CMMC or NIST SP 800-171 requirements.
Why this is first
The first commercial receipt must prove the paid wedge: one objective-sliced packet finding, one verifiable record, and one explicit limitation boundary before a design partner sends sensitive evidence.